Weekly Legal Review Archive
Weekly BriefingIssue #326 June 2026

Buying Off-Plan Property in Kenya: What You Must Check Before Paying the Deposit

Executive Summary

Protecting Wealth, Property and Business Decisions

Buying Off-Plan Property in Kenya: What You Must Check Before Paying the Deposit

Off-plan property can be attractive, but buyers should not rely on brochures, promises or flexible payment plans alone. Before paying a deposit, they should verify the land, developer, approvals, sale agreement and payment structure to avoid costly surprises later.

Buying Off-Plan Property from Abroad: Why Photos, Agents and Brochures Are Not Enough

Diaspora buyers often rely on WhatsApp photos, site videos, agents or relatives when buying property in Kenya. While this may help with visibility, it does not confirm ownership, approvals, developer capacity or the legal safety of the transaction. Independent review remains necessary before sending money.

The Sale Agreement: Where Off-Plan Buyers Win or Lose Protection

In off-plan property transactions, the sale agreement is the buyer’s main protection. It should clearly address the completion date, payment milestones, refund rights, delays, defects, handover documents and what happens if the developer fails to complete the project.

Off-Plan Property Buyer Checklist in Kenya

Before paying for an off-plan unit, buyers should check the land ownership, developer documents, approvals, sale agreement, payment terms, completion timeline and final transfer process. A simple checklist can help identify red flags before money is committed.

"The law does not eliminate risk. It allocates it. Our role is to protect your interests."

Kago Mburu Advocates

Featured Analysis

Featured Insight

Buying Off-Plan Property in Kenya: What You Must Check Before Paying the Deposit

Off-plan property has become a common way of buying apartments, maisonettes, townhouses and commercial units in Kenya. The idea is simple: a buyer commits to purchase a unit before the project is fully completed. In some cases, the building may already be under construction. In others, the buyer may be paying when the project is still at the drawing, approval or early construction stage.

This is why off-plan property is attractive. The price may be lower than a completed unit. The developer may offer flexible instalments. The buyer may be promised a better unit, future capital appreciation, rental income or early access to a project before the price increases. For many buyers, it feels like a practical way to enter the property market gradually.

But off-plan property is not the same as buying a completed house.

When buying a completed property, the buyer can inspect the house, confirm its condition, verify the title and complete the transfer based on an existing asset. In an off-plan transaction, the buyer is often paying before the final product exists. What the buyer has at the beginning is a promise: that the developer will build, complete, hand over and eventually transfer a valid legal interest in the unit.

That promise must be tested before money is paid.

A typical off-plan transaction begins with marketing. The buyer sees a brochure, floor plan, show house, site visit, video, online advert or sales presentation. The developer or agent then asks the buyer to reserve a unit by signing a booking form or letter of offer and paying a booking fee or deposit. After that, a sale agreement may be issued, followed by instalment payments tied either to dates or construction milestones. At the end, the buyer expects handover of the unit and the documents needed to complete ownership.

The risk is that each stage can create legal and financial consequences. A buyer may think they are only “reserving” a unit, but the documents signed and payments made may already create binding obligations. A booking fee may appear small, but it may affect refund rights. A letter of offer may look informal, but it may become important if a dispute arises. That is why legal review should not wait until the final agreement is ready. It should begin before the first serious payment is made.

The first question is ownership of the land. The buyer must know who owns the land on which the development is being built. Is the land registered in the developer’s name? Is the developer working with a separate landowner? Is there a joint venture, development agreement or other arrangement giving the developer authority to sell units? If the developer does not own the land, the buyer must understand the legal basis on which the developer is selling.

The second question is whether the land is clean. The land may be charged to a bank, affected by restrictions, cautions, unpaid rates, rent issues, disputes, family claims, succession issues or other interests. A buyer should not assume that a title copy sent by WhatsApp or email is enough. The title position must be independently verified before the buyer commits funds.

The third question is whether the project is properly approved. Off-plan buyers should look beyond drawings and marketing images. They should ask whether the project has county approvals, approved architectural plans, construction approvals, project registration and other regulatory permissions where applicable. What is marketed must also match what is approved. A buyer may be shown a unit, parking allocation, floor plan or amenity that is not properly reflected in the approval documents.

The fourth question is what the buyer will receive at the end of the transaction. This is especially important for apartments and multi-unit developments. The buyer should understand whether the final ownership will be through sectional title, a lease, sublease or another registrable interest. It should also be clear how common areas, parking, service charge, management company arrangements and handover documents will be dealt with.

The fifth question is payment. In off-plan transactions, buyers often pay in instalments before completion. This can be convenient, but it also creates exposure. Payments should be tied to clear documents and, where possible, clear milestones. The buyer should know what each payment represents, whether it is refundable, when it becomes non-refundable, and what happens if construction slows down, stops or changes.

A payment plan is not protection by itself. It only tells the buyer when to pay. It does not explain what happens if the developer delays, fails to complete, changes the design, delivers a smaller unit, fails to provide documents or cannot transfer ownership. Those protections must come from the documents and the legal structure of the transaction.

This is where many buyers make mistakes. They focus on the price, the unit number, the payment plan and the promised completion date. They do not ask enough questions about the land, approvals, developer authority, financing, transfer process and remedies if things go wrong. By the time the problem becomes clear, the buyer may already have paid a large deposit or several instalments.

Off-plan property is not automatically unsafe. There are genuine developers and well-structured projects that are completed successfully. The problem is not the off-plan model itself. The problem is paying before understanding what is being bought, who has authority to sell it, whether the project is legally approved, how the buyer’s money is protected and how ownership will eventually be transferred.

The safest approach is to slow down before payment. Before reserving a unit, signing a letter of offer, paying a booking fee or committing to instalments, the buyer should have the project documents independently reviewed.

A buyer should ask five basic questions. Who owns the land? Who is developing the project? What approvals are in place? What exactly am I buying? What happens if the developer does not complete as promised?

If those questions are not answered clearly, the buyer is not investing from a position of confidence. The buyer is relying on trust.

When buying off-plan property in Kenya, do not buy the dream before checking the documents. The best time to protect yourself is before you pay. Once money has been sent, the buyer’s position may change from negotiation to recovery, enforcement or dispute resolution.

Key Takeaways

* Off-plan property means buying before the unit is fully completed.

* The transaction usually starts with marketing, reservation, a letter of offer, deposit, sale agreement, instalments, construction and eventual handover.

* Buyers should verify land ownership and developer authority before paying.

* Approval documents should be checked before relying on brochures or show houses.

* Buyers should understand what legal ownership document they will receive after completion.

* Payment terms should be tied to clear documents, milestones and remedies.

* Independent legal review should happen before the deposit is paid, not after a dispute arises.

Need help reviewing an off-plan property transaction? Have the land, project documents, approvals and payment structure checked before you pay.

  • Off-plan property means buying before the unit is fully completed.
  • The transaction usually starts with marketing, reservation, a letter of offer, deposit, sale agreement, instalments, construction and eventual handover.
  • Buyers should verify land ownership and developer authority before paying.
  • Approval documents should be checked before relying on brochures or show houses.
  • Buyers should understand what legal ownership document they will receive after completion.
  • Payment terms should be tied to clear documents, milestones and remedies.
  • Independent legal review should happen before the deposit is paid, not after a dispute arises.

Need help reviewing an off-plan property transaction? Have the project, documents and sale agreement checked before you pay.

Regulatory Pulse

NCA National Construction Authority

The National Construction Authority continues to place emphasis on project registration, contractor licensing and monitoring of construction sites. For off-plan buyers, this matters because the project should not only exist in a brochure or sales presentation. Buyers should ask whether the development has been registered with NCA, whether the contractor has a current practicing license, and whether the site has faced any suspension or compliance issue.

NEMA

A recent NEMA notice on a proposed large-scale residential development in Kileleshwa demonstrates why environmental approval is important in off-plan housing. The project involved a proposal for over 1,000 residential apartments, with public comments invited before the environmental decision-making process was concluded. For off-plan buyers, this matters because environmental approval is not a technical issue for the developer alone. It may affect drainage, traffic, parking, waste management, neighbouring properties, project design, timelines and even whether construction proceeds as marketed. Before paying for an off-plan unit, buyers should ask whether the project required NEMA approval, whether the EIA process was undertaken, and whether any objections, conditions or environmental concerns could affect completion or handover.

County Government Approvals

County approvals remain central to the off-plan housing model. A developer should have the relevant development permission, approved architectural plans, structural approvals, construction permits and, eventually, occupation or completion approvals. What is marketed to buyers should match what has been approved by the county. Why it matters: if the approved plans differ from the brochure, the buyer may later face problems with unit size, parking, amenities, floor layout, occupation or handover.

Ministry of Lands

The sectional properties framework remains important for buyers of apartments, maisonettes, townhouses and other multi-unit developments. Under the conversion and registration process, sectional plans are used to create legally recognizable individual units, with separate titles or leases issued for each unit. A key safeguard is that where conversion is being pursued but the original parcel title is unavailable, the Registrar may issue a Gazette notice calling for the title. If the title is not produced within the required period, the Registrar may proceed to register the sectional plan, issue unit titles or leases, and close the old parcel register. Why it matters: an off-plan buyer should not only ask whether the project will be completed. The buyer should also ask how the specific unit will become a registrable legal interest. Without a clear sectional title, lease or transfer structure, a buyer may pay for an apartment but face delays or uncertainty in obtaining proper ownership documents.

Key Judicial Precedents

Musyoka v Tiara Properties Limited [2025] KEELC 793

In Musyoka case, the court dealt with one of the most overlooked stages of an off-plan property transaction: the letter of offer. When buying an off plan property or developments, a buyer is first given a booking form, reservation form or letter of offer before the formal sale agreement is prepared. At that stage, the buyer may assume that the document is only preliminary and that the real legal commitment will begin later. The buyer may then sign quickly and pay the deposit in order to secure the unit. This case shows why that approach can be risky. The dispute involved an off-plan commercial unit. The developer issued a letter of offer to the buyer setting out the unit, purchase price, payment terms, deposit, expected completion date and the next step of preparing the formal sale agreement. The buyer accepted the offer and paid the required deposit. Later, the developer attempted to withdraw from the arrangement and refund the money, arguing that no formal sale agreement had been executed. The court did not accept the argument that the absence of a formal sale agreement meant there was no binding relationship. It considered the contents of the letter of offer, the conduct of the parties and the payment of the deposit. The court found that once the buyer accepted the offer and paid the deposit, the parties had moved beyond ordinary negotiations. For off-plan buyers, the lesson is very practical. The legal risk does not begin only when the final sale agreement is signed. It may begin much earlier, when the buyer signs the letter of offer and pays the booking fee or deposit. That early document may later determine whether the buyer has rights, whether the developer can withdraw, whether a refund is available, and what remedies may be pursued. This is why buyers should not treat letters of offer as casual sales paperwork. Before signing, a buyer should confirm whether the offer is binding, whether the booking fee is refundable, the exact unit being reserved, the completion timeline, the payment schedule and what happens if the developer changes position or fails to proceed. Practical Impact A letter of offer in an off-plan transaction can create legal consequences before the formal sale agreement is signed. Buyers should therefore seek legal review before paying the first serious deposit, not after a dispute has already arisen.

A letter of offer can become binding once accepted and supported by payment. Buyers should review reservation documents before paying a deposit. Developers should not issue offer letters casually if they do not intend legal consequences. A booking fee or deposit may affect refund rights and legal remedies. Off-plan buyers should seek legal review before the first serious payment, not after a dispute arises.

Lomoro v Spring Hillpark Limited (Environment & Land Case E151 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 19144 (KLR).

In this case we look at one of the biggest fears in off-plan property transactions: what happens when the buyer pays, but the project does not move as promised. In an off-plan purchase, the buyer often makes payments long before the house, apartment or unit is complete. The developer may promise completion within a stated period, but construction may slow down, stall or fail entirely. By the time the buyer realizes that the project is not progressing, a substantial amount of money may already have been paid. That was the central concern in this case. The buyer had entered into a transaction with the developer and paid money towards the purchase of property in a project that was expected to be completed. The project was delayed, and the buyer eventually moved to court seeking relief. The court ordered a refund of the purchase price, showing that where a developer fails to deliver as agreed, the buyer is not left without legal remedies. The case is important because it reminds buyers that delay in an off-plan project is not a small inconvenience. It can affect finances, family plans, investment expectations and rental income projections. A buyer may have borrowed money, sold another asset, or planned around a promised completion date. When the project stalls, the buyer’s money is tied up while the promised property remains unavailable. The practical lesson is that the sale agreement must deal clearly with delay and default. It should state the completion date, construction milestones, refund rights, consequences of delay, interest, penalties, notice requirements and what happens if the developer cannot complete the project. Without these clauses, the buyer may be forced into a long and expensive dispute simply to recover money. This case also shows why buyers should not continue making payments blindly when construction progress is uncertain. Once delays become serious, the buyer should seek legal advice, review the agreement, preserve correspondence, demand explanations in writing and consider available remedies before the situation worsens. Practical Impact A stalled off-plan project can turn an investment into a recovery battle. Buyers should ensure that the agreement clearly protects them if the developer delays, fails to complete, or cannot hand over the property within the agreed timeline.

Completion timelines must be clearly stated in the agreement. Buyers should not continue paying where construction has stalled without legal advice. Refund clauses must be clear before payment is made. Developers should not use buyer funds without a realistic project delivery plan. A stalled project can force the buyer into costly litigation to recover money.

Nguru & another v Ganza Limited & 2 others [2024] KEHC 15692

The dispute arose from a risk that many off-plan buyers fail to investigate early: whether the land behind the project is charged to third parties. The plaintiffs had entered into agreements with Ganza Limited for the purchase of maisonettes in a proposed development known as Kitisuru Gardens. The maisonettes had not yet been constructed, meaning the buyers were purchasing the units on an off-plan basis. They paid deposits on the expectation that the developer would construct and deliver the units within the agreed timelines. The dispute arose because the project did not proceed as promised. The buyers complained that the maisonettes were not constructed and delivered. Their position was that the developer had failed to meet its contractual obligation and that they were entitled to relief from the court. The matter became more serious when the land on which the maisonettes were to be built was advertised for sale by public auction. This introduced the bank and auctioneer into the dispute. The buyers argued that they had not been informed that the project land was exposed to bank financing arrangements. They only became aware of the risk when the property was advertised for auction. The developer’s position was that it had not breached the agreements and that the buyers were not entitled to rescind the contracts. The bank’s position was that it was not a party to the sale agreements between the buyers and the developer, and that the buyers did not have a registered interest in the land that could defeat the bank’s rights. This is the central lesson from the case. In an off-plan transaction, the buyer may have a contract with the developer, but the land itself may be subject to other legal interests. If the land is charged to a bank, the buyer’s deposit does not automatically protect them against enforcement action by the financier. The court entered judgment in favour of the buyers against the developer and awarded refund of deposits, general damages, interest and costs. While the buyers obtained relief, the case shows how costly and stressful an off-plan dispute can become when land, financing and construction risks are not addressed before payment. Practical Impact Before paying for an off-plan unit, buyers should verify whether the project land is charged, whether the developer has disclosed all financing arrangements, and whether the sale agreement protects the buyer if the project fails or the land is exposed to auction.

* Off-plan buyers must verify whether the project land is charged to a bank before paying any deposit. * A buyer’s contract with the developer may not protect them against a financier with a registered interest over the land. * Developers should disclose financing arrangements, encumbrances or auction risks affecting the project land. * Paying a deposit does not automatically give the buyer priority over the bank, auctioneer or other third parties. * Buyers should insist on clear refund rights if the project fails, stalls or the land becomes exposed to enforcement. * Land due diligence in off-plan transactions must go beyond checking the unit, brochure or payment plan. * A failed off-plan project can leave buyers fighting for refunds, damages and costs years after payment.

Regnoil Kenya Limited v Karanja (Civil Appeal 534 of 2019) [2023] KECA 112 (KLR)

The court in the case looked at a completed off plan purchase agreement that the plaintiff stated did not meet the specifications. The dispute concerned Maisonette No. 262 at Diamond Park in South B. The buyer had entered into an agreement for sale with the developer for the purchase of the maisonette at an agreed price. She paid a substantial part of the purchase price, while the balance was to be paid through financing. The buyer’s complaint was that the property had not been completed to the standard she expected, particularly when compared to the sample house she had viewed before purchasing. She also complained of defects and issues around completion documents. The developer took a different position. It argued that the property had been completed in accordance with the agreement and that the buyer had failed to pay the outstanding balance of the purchase price. The dispute therefore became a contest between two positions: the buyer saying the developer had not delivered what was promised, and the developer saying the buyer had not completed payment as required. The Court of Appeal looked closely at the agreement between the parties. The court emphasized that parties are generally bound by the contract they sign. It was not enough for expectations around the sample house or quality of completion to exist generally; the key question was what the agreement actually required. The court was also concerned with the fact that the balance of the purchase price had not been paid. It ultimately interfered with the High Court’s earlier decision and allowed the appeal. For off-plan buyers, the lesson is very practical. A show house, brochure or sales presentation should not be left floating outside the contract. If the buyer expects the final unit to match a sample house, specific finishes, floor area, fittings, parking, common areas or quality standards, these should be clearly written into the sale agreement. The case also shows the importance of completion documents. Buyers should know what documents must be provided before the balance is paid, including occupation certificates, completion certificates, handover documents and any documents required by financiers. Practical Impact An off-plan checklist should not stop at title and approvals. It should also confirm specifications, finishes, completion documents, payment triggers, inspection rights, defects procedure and handover obligations before the buyer signs or pays.

An off-plan checklist helps buyers confirm what they are actually buying before they commit money. It ensures that brochures, show houses and verbal promises are matched against the sale agreement. It helps buyers verify the land, approvals, developer authority and final ownership structure. It reduces the risk of paying for a unit that is delayed, changed, defective or difficult to transfer. It helps buyers identify unfair clauses on refunds, delays, defects, payment milestones and handover.

Practical Implications for Advisors

Need Legal Guidance?

We are here to help you navigate complex legal matters with clarity, strategy and excellence.

Land Law
Conveyancing
Commercial & Corporate
Dispute Resolution
Succession & Family Law
Employment Law
Notarial Services
Book a Consultationkagomburuadvocates.com/contact
WhatsApp0731 976 499
Emailinfo@kagomburuadvocates.com
Visit Our Websitekagomburuadvocates.com
LinkedInlinkedin.com/company/kago-mburu-advocates
TikTok@kagomburuadvocates

Strategic Implications for Your Matter

Does your property, transaction, or succession matter intersect with these findings? Request a private consultation.

Online uploads are limited to 10 PDF pages and 5MB per file. Larger bundles can be sent by email or WhatsApp.

For within a week matters — our team prioritises your request accordingly.